Original series Klingons with bronzed skin and upswept eyebrows |
By way of background, in the original TV series, with its limited budget, Klingons looked more or less human.TV of the time being what it was, there was some inconsistency.
In some cases they had bronzed skin and bushy upswept eyebrows. In other cases, the makeup was very minimal, and they looked like ordinary guys in stupid costumes.
Original series Klingons -- ordinary guys in stupid costumes |
Klingon Captain in the first movie |
I never really thought much about it -- it was just a TV show. OK, a bunch of TV shows and movies. But still. But the Geekerati were unhappy. The inconsistent look of the Klingons was...well...inconsistent. And how could that be!
Worf, with his bony plates |
It was beautifully done (as you can see from the clips below). ANd the second clip shows the first instance in the Star Trek universe where the inconsistency is explicitly addressed. But Worf refuses to discuss it. It's a long story that they don't discuss with outsiders.
For a real explanation, fans would have to wait until Star Trek Enterprise, the prequel series. A whole explanation is provided, involving genetic engineering, and an attempt by the Klingons to develop a breed of super-warriors. That is summed up here.
I acknowledge that the whole retcon was done reasonably well, and the explanation sounds as plausible as any other fantastical techno/bio-babble that you hear in the series. But it has always seemed unnecessary to me. Assuming the STPtB really had to address it (a questionable assumption in my book, but...whatever) it would have made more sense (and been simpler) to simply say that there are various races of Klingons. Some look more like humans than others.
There are various races of humans. Some have dark skin and some have light. Some have straight black hair, and eyes with epicanthic folds. Others don't. One could go on and on. It's true that the differences between the original Klingons and the redesigned ones are lager than the differences between Blacks and Whites and Asians. But so what? Think about dogs. Irish Wolfhounds, Schnauzers and Labrador Retrievers are all part of the same species, but look vastly different. There are various breeds of housecats, and they look different than each other, though the differences aren't as pronounced as the differences between dog breeds. And don't get me started on daylilies and hostas. Is it really so hard to believe that there are bigger differences between races of Klingons? I don't think so.
Now, there's one problem with this. "Blood Oath," a second season episode of DS9, featured Kang, Kor and Koloth -- the main Klingon antagonists from TOS. In TOS they appeared human-like. But in DS9 they had all the new Klingon makeup and prosthetic ridges. Of course, that was before the "Trials and Tribble-ations" episode, so it was before the writers had thought to acknowledge the issue. But that change in how these specific individuals look doesn;t jibe with the race explanation. Of course, it doesn't jibe with the genetic engineering retcon either. Maybe something about how, sometimes a Klingon transforms from one to to another? They are an alien species, afterall, with biology different than ours.
Either way, the whole genetic engineering angle was unnecesarilly complicated and didn;t really contribute anything useful.
evolution
ReplyDeleteThen why did Enterprise feature thge newer Klingons?
Delete